The all-caps, multi-colored claim fills the social media page.
Anti-vaccine activist and author of the claim, Nicolas Hulscher, peers ominously through the print. A new post is making the rounds this week, and it’s the latest from Hulscher.
Hulscher first broke his story in February on LindellTV, hosted by that famous science expert, the My Pillow guy.
Hulscher’s claim: according to the CDC’s “own data”, the measles vaccine is far deadlier than the actual measles.
Hulscher cites the CDC website VAERS, a site for self-reporting adverse vaccine reactions.
VAERS was never meant to be taken as fact, as evidence, or as a verified study of ANY kind. It’s a public forum.
Anyone can report: Individuals. Parents. Vaccine deniers and conspiracists.
All anonymous and unverified.
My puppy Jolene could file a report if only she had opposable thumbs.
From the CDC’s VAERS report, Hulscher constructs a terrifying three-decades-long graph. Over three decades, VAERS reports 193 deaths due to the vaccine, but only seven deaths from measles in the same time span.
That’s a whopping 2,657% higher count of vaccine deaths compared to measles deaths!! Sound the alarm! Hulscher even discounts the measles deaths because malpracticing doctors didn’t employ (unsubstantiated) cures like “cod liver oil and vitamin A.”
“Vaccines kill!” Hulscher declared on the My Pillow show.
The American Academy of Pediatrics and five decades of peer-reviewed research disagree: the MMR vaccine is, and continues to be, safe and effective.
Measles is not simply a rite of passage, NBD childhood sniffles. Measles brings a risk of brain inflammation, serious respiratory complications, as well as degenerative central nervous system disease years after infection.
Twenty-six years ago, measles was declared eliminated in the United States.
Tragically, we will likely lose elimination status this week. As I write, an international panel of experts is meeting to determine our status.
Pseudoscience and conspiracies are attractive because like Hulscher, they offer certainty. They offer Gnostic-like insider information not available to the rest of us.
Actual science requires controlled studies, peer-review, and consensus of evidence.
Too many of us want the easy answer.





























