Saving the Day

The fine print on my t-shirt says, “RNA Saves the Day.” I bought the shirt almost three years ago, to celebrate my trips to the Texas Motor Speedway for my first two COVID shots.

But here we are three years later, with vaccine misinformation still percolating through the population. Most recently, the State Surgeon General of Florida warned against mRNA vaccines, claiming the vaccines are contaminated with DNA fragments.

Know what else is “contaminated” with harmless DNA fragments? The food you eat.

Even before their release, alarmists were pre-refusing the mRNA vaccines: It’s too fast! No one wants an experimental vaccine!

Just for fun, let’s look at what was happening in the before-times, the years before covid flipped our world.

In the days before shutdowns and paper towel shortages, researchers were knee-deep investigating the use of mRNA in treating a myriad of diseases. Of particular interest were diseases caused by inborn metabolic errors.

For example, people born with a glycogen storage disease do not make the protein needed to release sugar from storage between meals. If these people do not eat every hour or two (including all through the night), they risk life-threatening low blood sugar.

What if mRNA could be used to teach the body to produce the missing protein? Researchers were on it.

Already mRNA was being injected directly into heart muscle during open-heart surgery, instructing the heart to build new vessels to circumvent clogged arteries.

And personalized cancer treatments using mRNA had an astounding turn-around of 45 days from development to patient.

So, when the genetic sequence of the COVID virus was published in January 2020, it only took two days for vaccine scientists to decide which of the COVID spikes to target.

One hour – that’s all it took to design the mRNA for the spike used in the vaccines. Forty-five days later, the NIH began vaccine development.

It wasn’t speedy because scientists were careless. It was speedy because they weren’t starting from scratch.

And research hasn’t stopped.

In a clinical trial of melanoma patients, one group was given Moderna’s mRNA melanoma therapy along with a biologic that enhances immune response. Another group was given the biologic alone.

Three years after treatment, patients who received the mRNA therapy in addition to the biologic saw a 49% reduction in the risk of melanoma recurrence or death and a 62% reduction in the risk of metastasis or death compared to those who received only the biologic .

That’s huge.

Saving the day, indeed.

My Monkeys Got It Right

I knew it. I just knew it. 

In the 1970s, the American anti-evolution movement was gaining steam. Movement leaders set out to strip creationism of explicitly religious language and embed creation science in public schools as an alternative to evolution science. 

When research in “creation science” stalled, anti-evolution activists turned their sights on culture. 

Fighting evolution was never about science evidence. Originally, it was a theological problem.

In THE GOD OF MONKEY SCIENCE, I offer mounds of evidence indicating that evolution is no longer simply a theological issue but has morphed into a cultural issue.

And now, three months after the release of my book, comes a new book by Dr. Jason Lisle of the Biblical Science Institute. 

Lisle, an astrophysicist and a young and prominent face of young earth creationism, erases all doubt: the battle ground is not science evidence, it’s culture.

My Monkeys got it right.

Science, Both-Sides-Isms, and Texas Public Schools

Science, Both-Sides-Isms, and Texas Public Schools

Todd Wood is a Ph.D. biochemist and is the president of Core Academy of Science, a young earth creationist think tank. Wood is a popular host and speaker and was featured in the widely distributed documentary-style film “Is Genesis History?”

A few years ago, Wood caught a lot of flak from creationist quarters because of an essay he posted on the Core Academy site.

“Evolution is not a theory in crisis,” wrote Wood.

“There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it … There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well.”

WHAT? Send the Ken Ham Bat Signal!

Then Dr. Wood added: “It is my own faith choice to reject evolution . . ..” 

While we were off-line and prepping for a feast of roast dinosaur with all the trimmings, the Texas State Board of Education was doing its best to sabotage science education in the state. The week before Thanksgiving, the Board met in Austin to adopt new science textbooks. 

By Friday, eight of twenty-two science texts had been rejected by the Board. 

Board member Evelyn Brooks voted against the textbooks because they didn’t give “considerable weight” to creationism. Students should be presented with both evolution and creationism in Texas public schools, according to Brooks.

Apparently, a majority of State Board members agreed. 

Fighting evolution has morphed into rejection of climate science. Also rejected were textbooks that, in the words of Board member Patricia Harding, “scared” children about climate change. 

If you’re not a Texan, why should you care? The sheer size of Texas public education makes the state a textbook juggernaut. If Texas ain’t buying it, it’s not being printed.

There is a reason why those who promote a six- to ten-thousand-year-old earth are always religious.

There is a reason why those who promote an instantaneous creation or a designed creation are always religious.

If evidence for a young earth or special creation or special design truly existed, there would be at least a few non-religious scientists supporting these positions, but there are not.

There are multitudes of religious people who, unlike Todd Wood, hold to faith and accept science evidence. Credit to Wood, however, for his intellectual honesty regarding his rejection of the evidence.

It is Todd Wood’s theology that demands he reject evolution, not the science. It is the Texas board members’ theology that demands they reject evolution, not the evidence.

As such, “both sides” have no place in a public-school classroom.

Launch Day for The God of Monkey Science

Today’s the day!! Monkeys are on the loose!

THE GOD OF MONKEY SCIENCE OFFICIALLY RELEASES TODAY! I am so excited to launch this book into the world!

Please rate and/or review on Amazon, even if you didn’t get your book there. Ratings/reviews are critical in showing the book to potential readers (algorithms and all that).

If you will, copy and paste your review to Goodreads, Christianbook, and any other bookseller you’d like.

I posted direct links to review below.

A MILLION thanks and a big monkey hug!!

Amazon

Goodreads

Christianbook

Barnes And Noble

COVID Vaccines: The Fast and the Furious

COVID Vaccines: The Fast and the Furious

They said it was “experimental.”

They said it was developed too fast, that it was “rushed.”

They said it was a political move by bureaucratic government scientists, and Anthony Fauci was the archvillain.

They even said it was a monstrosity that would change your DNA, make you infertile, and give Bill Gates microchip control over a population of “sheeple.”

Today, hundreds of thousands of people owe their lives to a COVID vaccine using mRNA technology – technology that has been studied and refined since the 1980s.

Molecular biologist Katalin Karikó was convinced that mRNA could revolutionize vaccine delivery. For almost a decade, Dr. Karikó worked in obscurity. 

A chance meeting with immunologist Drew Weissman at the University of Pennsylvania changed history.

It was 1998. Karikó and Weissman were chatting at the copy machine, waiting for it to warm up. Thus began a partnership with the goal of using mRNA to deliver a safe and revolutionary vaccine. 

Karikó and Weissman first published their groundbreaking discoveries in 2005. For the next fifteen years, they continue to work and publish with little funding.

But two biotech companies, Moderna and BioNTech, noticed. 

And in 2020, with a deadly pandemic looming, these companies combined the years of coronavirus research being done at the NIH and other labs with the work of Karikó and Weissman to produce two COVID-19 vaccines, each using mRNA technology.

Today, FOUR DECADES of research later, the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology was awarded to Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman. 

Congratulations and well-done from a grateful world. 

Christian Nationalism and Science Denial

Christian Nationalism and Science Denial

I grew up in a small city in Texas. Almost everyone I knew went to church somewhere, usually some version of an evangelical church. 

Currently, many Americans who self-identify as “evangelical” aren’t a part of a traditionally evangelical church. “Evangelical” doesn’t necessarily describe where you go to church, or even if you go to church at all.

In fact, more than one-fifth of Americans who want the United States to officially be a “Christian nation” are secular or belong to a non-Christian faith. In 21st century America, “Christian” is more a cultural and political identity, rather than a religious one.

In the wake of this evolution, the terms “Christian” and “nationalism” have married. Characteristic of this marriage is an idealized version of history – that our nation was better, more moral, more diligent in the past. 

Other societies and cultures have idealized the past. Societies that idealize the past have many things in common, including support of “strong man” style leaders and a return to a “law and order” approach to society. 

There’s a lot to unpack here, but I want to focus on another characteristic of cultures that idealize the past: anti-intellectualism that often manifests as anti-science attitudes. 

Christian nationalism, as well as a belief that the Bible is historically and scientifically literally true, tracks with a greater tendency to believe conspiracy theories. Both groups track with anti-vaccine attitudes. 

White evangelicals were the religious demographic most resistant to a COVID vaccine, and also the most resistant to masking and social distancing.

And it didn’t stop with COVID. Already we are seeing state legislatures considering rollbacks of childhood vaccine requirements for school children. 

Look just below the surface of disputes about “science and religion” and you will see that they are primarily conflicts about moral and cultural order. 

Read more in The God of Monkey Science: People of Faith in a Modern Scientific World – available now for preorder!

Walking with Dinos

Walking with Dinos

Everyone should have one of those friends who will do vexatious things with you. Extra points if you can talk the friend into doing something you aren’t willing to do yourself. 

A few years ago, while road-tripping with friends to their ranch in the Texas Hill Country, we decided to detour off the highway and back in time…

About a hundred million years ago, give or take a few million years, two dinosaurs left footprints in the soft mud along an ancient inland sea, now the location of the Paluxy River. One was an enormous plant-eating sauropod; the other a fearsome meat-eating ancestor of T rex. 

Given their dietary preferences, most likely these two were not buddies, but both guys left their mark in the mud. 

The little town of Glen Rose, Texas is home to Dinosaur Valley State Park. As water levels of the Paluxy wax and wane, extraordinary fossilized dinosaur tracks are exposed. More than 200,000 visitors visit the “Dinosaur Capital of Texas.”

But for some, the dinos aren’t the main attraction.

In the late 1930s, a young earth creationist “found” human footprints, walking alongside our dinosaur pals. 

Glen Rose became the destination not only for dinosaur fans, but for those who sought “proof” that the earth was less than 10,000 years old.

The human “prints” have been soundly debunked, but once a story becomes a tourist attraction, there’s no turning back.

Glen Rose is also home to the “Creation Evidence Museum of Texas.” Of course, we pulled off the highway and went in. 

The science misinformation was overwhelming. The displays tortured both science and scripture. 

There was a gift shop, too, always one of my favorite spots in any museum. 

I wanted a postcard. 

Unfortunately, I’m afflicted with audible eye-rolls and I couldn’t bear to hand over the dollar lest the cashier thought I was on board with it all.  So, I handed over my dollar to my friend Melinda who handed it over for me.

Read more about the Glen Rose tracks (both dino and human) and the response of the Glen Rose community in my new book, The God of Monkey Science: People of Faith in a Modern Scientific World

“No one hates a book as much as people who haven’t read it.”*

“No one hates a book as much as people who haven’t read it.”*

I’m married to a dermatologist, so I can attest to this fact: there’s no magic cream that will give you thick skin.

I’ve been writing about science and faith for ten years. In 2021, my first book was published. My second is releasing in October. The first was well-received, and there’s lots of excitement around the second.

But that doesn’t mean everyone loves them.

The harshest critiques are usually SOOO over the top that honestly, it’s entertaining. 

Here’s the latest and greatest:

Twitter guy posts a screenshot of the publisher’s catalogue, featuring my two books. With lots of gnashing of teeth, Twitter guy bemoans the current state of Christian publishing. 

Twitter guy calls my books “junk.”

Hmmm – the new book doesn’t release until October. It’s also apparent he hasn’t read the first one, either. 

My response: I hope you read them, I’m disappointed that you dismissed the books as “junk” without reading.

WELLLLLLLLLL.

Twitter guy plays the pig-in-need-of-a-makeover trump card.

Twitter guy invites me to put lipstick on a pig, and not only lipstick, but also perfume, jewelry, and practically an entire Sephora if I like, but my piggies (my books apparently) will still be pigs. 

And then, Twitter guy mic drop: I don’t need to read the books to know they’re junk.

Twitter guy is a writer at one of the big young earth creationist organizations, so I can only image how much he’d dislike the books if he’d actually read them. 

Thick skin!

*Mike Cosper, Christianity Today

MALARIA PART 2: Mosquitos, Malaria, and Intelligent Design Creationism

MALARIA PART 2: Mosquitos, Malaria, and Intelligent Design Creationism

Out of the three billion or so base pairs that make up human DNA, there is a single gene with a big job. 

This gene codes for hemoglobin, the protein in red blood cells responsible for carrying oxygen to every cell in the body. Just one change, just one mutation at a single point in the gene results in a defective version of hemoglobin. 

Healthy red blood cells have a characteristic biconcave shape, perfect for squeezing into the tiniest of blood vessels to deliver the oxygen payload carried by hemoglobin. 

Defective hemoglobin changes the shape of a red blood cell. Instead of smooth and biconcave, the cells are hard and sticky and are C-shaped, like a crescent or sickle. 

We have two copies of every gene – one from mom, one from dad. If one copy of the hemoglobin gene is operational, enough functioning red blood cells are made to keep a person healthy. A carrier of a defective hemoglobin gene may never know it or may only have occasional problems. 

British physician Anthony Allison grew up in the Rift Valley of Kenya. Allison returned to Africa in the 1950s with the intent of studying the A-B-O blood groups in East African people, but he changed course when he observed a curious phenomenon. 

Almost forty percent of the population in equatorial Africa were carriers of the defective hemoglobin gene, and most carriers were clustered in warm coastal areas.

Allison knew that the warm, wet areas of Kenya were breeding grounds for the mosquito that carries the deadly malaria parasite.

Was there a connection between carriers of the defective hemoglobin gene and malaria? Allyson wanted to know. 

Thousands of blood samples and a massive study later, Allison had his answer: carriers of the defective form of hemoglobin are resistant to malaria.

Carriers produce just enough defective hemoglobin to make their blood cells inhospitable to the malaria parasite. The parasites have a hard time entering sickled cells. 

To advocates of the intelligent design version of creationism, human DNA bears the mark of design. “Intelligent design” says that random mutations only break things. Important mutations, mutations that confer benefit, cannot arise randomly and therefore must have been directed, micromanaged by an intelligent designer.

Mosquitos kill, but a mutation in one gene confers malaria resistance. A good thing, right? A dandy design! With a tweak at just the right spot in the DNA, the designer heroically saves lives. 

Not so fast. 

It is not a surprise that a gene that provides malaria resistance would take off in a population. But with a high frequency of a single gene, it won’t be long before two carriers have children. If both parents are carriers, chances are ONE IN FOUR that a child will inherit not one, but TWO copies of the defective hemoglobin gene. 

Children who inherit two copies of the gene are resistant to malaria, yes, but at a terrific cost: sickle cell disease.

In sickle cell disease, red blood cells stick and clump together and block blood vessels. The result is excruciating pain and often stroke. Sickled cells are short-lived, so sufferers are anemic, exhausted, and prone to serious infections and kidney failure. 

Before modern medicine, children with sickle cell disease usually died in early childhood. Many still do.

The malaria resistance afforded to those with one copy of the gene fuels its spread. 

Crediting the malaria-resistance mutation to a loving choice by an intelligent designer demands consideration of the other side of the coin: the 300,000 children born each year with sickle-cell disease.